Показаны сообщения с ярлыком carpocalypse now. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком carpocalypse now. Показать все сообщения

Korea's Ssangyong Runs Out Of Cash, Chinese Won’t Bail Them Out [Carpocalypse Now]

Korean automaker Ssangyong is straight broke; it’s not even able to pay its 8,000 employees for the month of December. Parent company Shanghai Automotive’s response? Get bent.

Ssangyong is the fourth largest Korean automaker and has recently broken into the European market, first with the Musso SUV and lately with the much more attractive Rexton. Now it's $75 million in debt.

“Due to lack of operating funds for December, it is impossible for the company to pay salaries any longer,” the company announced to workers on Friday. Domestic Ssangyong sales have fallen by more than a third in 2008, forcing it to close 60 dealers.

Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC), which acquired 51% in 2004, has refused Ssangyong’s requests for emergency funds. The Korean company now plans to hold a protest rally against SAIC. Koreans vs. Chinese? What is this — 1950 all over again? [via Autocar]



Related posts:



White House "Looking At All Options," Toyota Stock Drops 10%, Honda Cuts Production [Carpocalypse Now]

The Carpocalypse draws nigh after Senate Republicans lanced last night's bailout. In response, the White House now says "all options are on the table" and Toyota's scared after its stock drops 10%.

The S&P said a month ago that if the credit crunch wasn't taken care of, by 2009 the world would be facing global automaker liquidation. That's what we call the Carpocalypse and it's getting much closer to reality after Senate Republicans killed the House bailout bill without brokering a compromise, hung up on an attempt to strong-arm the UAW into a wage reduction for current workers that apparently isn't factually based.

Meanwhile, Toyota poised for its first U.S. sales decline in 13 years, canceled its 2009 annual dealer meeting in Las Vegas to trim expenses as consumer demand for new cars plummets. Additionally, the Japanese automaker released a statement saying a bankruptcy among the not-so-Big Three would "exacerbate an already difficult environment" for itself and the industry as a whole. On those comments, and thanks to the Senate Republicans, shares were off 10% in Nikkei trading today.

In response, the White House just moments ago claimed "all options are on the table" including, apparently, looking to breaking off a chunk of the $700 billion in TARP financing set aside for the financial industry. Toyota stock recovered after this news, down now just over 1.5%.

Fears of a bankruptcy of any of the not-so-Big Three also hit Honda today, who we just heard will now be cutting output in North America by 119,000 between now and the end of March at plants in Alliston, Ont., Ohio, Alabama and a new factory in Indiana that began producing cars just last month.. Run for the hills, folks!

[via MSN, Globe and Mail]



Related posts:



Related posts:



Map Of Every Domestic Automaker Manufacturing Site Reveals The Extent Of The Carpocalypse [What Happens If The Not-So-Big Three Fail]

People say "Detroit" deserves to fail. Maybe, but as you can tell by the map below of every manufacturing facility from the domestic automakers, they'll take pretty much the entire Midwest with 'em.

Since it seems like half of the punditocracy, Republicans in Congress and every anti-car hippie with a blog seems to be interested, even giddy, at the prospect of a couple of the not-so-Big Three going under, we thought we'd try to put a little perspective on just what that means. It's easy for people to say "Detroit" deserves to fail, but it's not really just Detroit that would fail, it's pretty much the entire Midwest. We've put together a Google Maps overlay of all US manufacturing facilities currently in operation by one of the big three. Peruse at your leisure, then imagine all of those factories across the US empty and silent.


View Larger Map



Related posts:



Related posts:



The Five Emotional Stages Of The Carpocalypse [Carpocalypse Now]

As is true for all tragedies, the Carpocalypse and subsequent failure of the U.S. automakers has encouraged a wide array of reactions ranging from overwhelming patriotism to over-exaggerated panic. We look at the five most common responses below.

5.) Jingoism

Nothing says "we love America" more than "we hate everyone else." Domestic car dealers are clearly on the front lines of this downturn in sales and have turned to hating on foreign car companies. A dealer in South Carolina is running angry rants on the radio (listen here) that blame anyone who buys a Toyota for their own loss of employment. The most xenophobic car dealer award probably goes to Bob Swift of Sacramento who sells Chrysler products and had this to say:

"People are reluctant to buy our cars because of the perception that maybe the quality isn't what it should be. Therefore, they're going to buy Japanese, they're going to buy a German car, forgetting that 50 years ago, we had to bomb those people and kill them by the thousands to keep them from overtaking our country."

Even if you ignore the many Japanese and German cars built and/or assembled in South Carolina and California, the foreign car companies are doing just as poorly.

4.) Panic

Riots in Detroit used to be so common David Bowie wrote a song about it. The catastrophe that is the not-so-Big Three is no exception. People are selling their stuff, refusing to fly and trying to keep their profile low. We're just waiting for this to happen next in Detroit. Of course, that's only if anyone's left living there.

3.) Anger

With so many jobs in jeopardy and so much emotional investment in American companies, it isn't surprising people are playing the blame game. We have senators blaming CEOs, pundits blaming unions and Barney Frank yelling at everyone it isn't a happy time to be involved in the industry.

2.) Prayer

Nietzsche said "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." We wouldn't mention this to the hundreds of thousands of people who rely in Detroit for a job and don't want to be unemployed this Christmas. The congregants of Detroit's Greater Grace Church here are praying someone, anyone, performs a miracle and saves Ford, Chrysler and GM. They've gone so far as to pray over hybrids in a church based in Detroit. Sadly, they've already cancelled one of the worshiped hybrids. And did we mention they're hybrid SUVs? Hey, Jesus is in the resurrection business. Right?

1.) Morbid Curiosity

There's a great scene in the not-so-great The Glenn Miller Story where they're playing a song and a buzz bomb cuts out overhead, the clear sign the bomb will soon fall on someone. Everyone pauses. Silence. Explosion. Everyone, on stage at least, survives with the knowledge they were lucky this time but may not be so lucky again. We think most people are this stage. There's word of a bailout agreement but, even with this Deus ex Congressa there's no guarantee things will be peachy keen. Not knowing for sure what's going to happen we've taken to inventing games, holding symbolic bake sales and selling merch.

Thanks to Jason and Jim for the tips

[Photos: AP Photo/Thanassis Stavrakis via MyWay, David McNew/Getty Images]



Related posts:



Related posts:



The Case For GM CEO Rick Wagoner [Carpocalypse Now]

You may have seen Sen. Chris Dodd on "Meet The Press" this weekend tell Tom Brokaw GM CEO Rick Wagoner "has to move on." That's a terrible idea.

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Apparently Knows How To Make Cars Better Than Anyone) told Tom Brokaw on NBC's "Meet The Press" yesterday GM CEO Rick Wagoner "has to move on" and GM has "to consider new leadership" as part of a government-run restructuring. Given GM's lost billions of dollars and double digit market share over Wagoner's reign of terror at the General — why's that such a bad idea?

While we've been a vocal critic of GM's glacial restructuring effort, we've got to say the automaker probably should stick with the girl they brought with 'em to the ball — no matter how ugly. Mostly because we can't name anyone better who'd understand the product and the bureaucracy of the General. Yes, the very bureaucracy Wagoner never changed that made the automaker move so slowly to make the necessary changes in product to turn the ship around. But to bring in someone completely new to figure out that bureaucracy takes time GM just doesn't have without tens of billions more in public monies. While Ford CEO Alan Mulally seems like he's been able to do it at the big blue oval, it's taken him two years to get there. We're not even sure the General's got more than two months left in 'em.

What this automaker needs isn't a change in leadership so much as it needs an external force moving the current leadership to change quickly. "Slick" Rick Wagoner and Fritz "Big Money Grip" Henderson need to be pushed and pushed hard.

We all saw in Chrysler's ownership by Cerberus what happens when an outside entity with no knowledge of the complexities of the auto industry completely takes over an automaker. Frankly, we'd rather not see that happen with the other two not-so-Big Three. Instead, a system merging product and industry know-how with some kind of public oversight could come up with an understanding of the product necessary to make that change happen and how to make that product a reality.

Whether Nissan-Renault CEO Carlos Ghosn or Kirk Kerkorian's aborted attempt at making a quick buck, we've seen GM move quickly when some kind of external disruptor's been there to force change with the current leadership mix. If structured with the right level of power, that new external disruptor could be the third-party oversight board being recommended to oversee the public's investment in GM. Whatever the structural addition, there needs to be something forcing the leadership team at GM to move faster. And if then they're not moving fast enough, let that third-party board make the necessary changes, including lopping off Wagoner's head if need be.

Congress shouldn't fire Rick Wagoner as some kind of knee-jerk reaction designed to prove to their constituents the bridge loans for the not-so-Big Three aren't some kind of AIG-like boondoggle. But don't allow him to resume business as usual post bridge loan — hold Wagoner's feet to the fire until the General succeeds (if it's able to).

So we hate to say it but... Rick, would you like this dance? Just don this paper bag first, would you?



Related posts:



Related posts:



CNBC "Saving General Motors" Yet Again [Carpocalypse Now]

The first time CNBC tried "Saving GM" it didn't so much work. Now they're again taking us "Inside The Crisis" Monday night at 10 PM. We hope it doesn't feature Phil LeBeau giving mouth-to-mouth resuscitation to Rick Wagoner. [CNBC]



Related posts:



Related posts:



Ford Expects Profitability In 2011, Battery Electric Van By 2010, BEV Sedan For 2011 [Carpocalypse Now]

Ford today announced a plan to turn around its business, claiming it allows them to reach break-even level or profit by 2011. The plan includes building a battery-electric commercial van by 2010 and a BEV sedan by 2011.

The focus of the Ford's plan to save its business is to green the automaker by offering a full family of hybrids, plug-in hybrids and battery powered electric vehicles. The attention-getting portion of their plan is the production of an electric commercial van, we're suspecting might be based on the Ford Transit Connect, for the U.S. market by 2010. This will be followed up by a battery-powered electric sedan in 2011.

In order to offer this technology on such an accelerated timetable, Ford's plans call for a $14 billion investment in advanced technologies to improve fuel efficiency and the company is hoping to have $9 billion made available in bridge financing from Congress, though they hope to not have to use it.

To prove they mean business, Ford CEO Mulally suggested that he would take a salary of $1 a year if the company had to take a bridge loan from the government and that the company will sell its five corporate aircraft. Full details in the press release below.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY SUBMITS BUSINESS PLAN TO CONGRESS; PROFIT TARGET, ELECTRIC CAR STRATEGY AMONG NEW DETAILS

* Based on current business planning assumptions, Ford expects both its overall and its North American Automotive business pre-tax results to be breakeven or profitable in 2011

* Ford provided initial details of an accelerated vehicle electrification plan for a family of hybrids, plug-in hybrids and battery electric vehicles. The plan includes a Ford full battery electric vehicle (BEV) in a van-type vehicle for commercial fleet use in 2010 and a BEV sedan in 2011

* Ford’s plan calls for an investment of approximately $14 billion in the U.S. on advanced technologies and products to improve fuel efficiency during the next seven years

* Ford said it will sell its corporate aircraft as part of its overall cash improvement plan

DEARBORN, Mich., Dec. 2. 2008 – Ford Motor Company this morning submitted to Congress its comprehensive business plan, which details the company’s plan to return to profitability and outlines a request for potential access to a temporary bridge loan in case the current economic crisis worsens or there is a bankruptcy of a major competitor.

In the plan, Ford said the transformation of its North American automotive business will continue to accelerate through aggressive restructuring actions and the introduction of more high-quality, safe and fuel-efficient vehicles – including a broader range of hybrid-electric vehicles and the introduction of advanced plug-in hybrids and full electric vehicles.

Ford is asking for access to up to $9 billion in bridge financing, but reiterated that it hopes to complete its transformation without accessing the loan should Congress agree to make the funds available.

Despite the serious global economic downturn, Ford said it does not anticipate a liquidity crisis in 2009 – barring a bankruptcy by one of its domestic competitors or a more severe economic downturn that would further cripple automotive sales and create additional cash challenges.

“For Ford, government loans would serve as a critical backstop or safeguard against worsening conditions, as we drive transformational change in our company,” said Ford President and CEO Alan Mulally, who will testify before Congress this week.

In the plan submitted to Congress, Ford reiterated that its One Ford transformation plan remains fully in place, anchored by four key priorities:

* Aggressively restructure to operate profitably at the current demand and changing model mix;
* Accelerate development of new products our customers want and value;
* Finance our plan and improve our balance sheet; and
* Work together effectively as one team, leveraging our global assets.

“Ford is committed to building a sustainable future for the benefit of all Americans,” Mulally said. “We believe Ford is on the right path to achieve this vision.

“We appreciate the valid concerns raised by Congress about the future viability of the industry,” he added. “We hope that our submission today helps instill confidence in Ford’s commitment to change, including our accountability and shared sacrifice during this difficult economic period.”

Ford’s submission to Congress included new details about Ford’s future plans and forecasts, including:

* Based on current business planning assumptions – including U.S. industry sales for 2009, 2010 and 2011 of 12.5 million units, 14.5 million units and 15.5 million units, respectively – Ford expects both its overall and its North American automotive business pre-tax results to be breakeven or profitable in 2011, excluding any special items.
* As part of a continuing focus on building the Ford brand, the company said it is exploring strategic options for Volvo Car Corporation, including the possible sale of the Sweden-based premium automaker. The strategic review is in line with a broad range of actions Ford is taking to strengthen its balance sheet and ensure it has the resources to fund its plan. Since 2007, Ford has sold Aston Martin, Jaguar, Land Rover and the majority of its stake in Mazda.
* Ford’s plan calls for an investment of approximately $14 billion in the U.S. on advanced technologies and products to improve fuel efficiency during the next seven years.
* Half of the Ford, Lincoln and Mercury light-duty nameplates by 2010 will qualify as “Advanced Technology Vehicles” under the U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act – increasing to 75 percent in 2011 and more than 90 percent in 2014. Ford said it has included these projects in its application to the Department of Energy for loans under that Act and hopes to receive $5 billion in direct loans by 2011 to support Ford’s investment in advanced technologies and products.
* From its largest light duty trucks to its smallest cars, Ford will improve the fuel economy of its fleet an average of 14 percent for 2009 models, 26 percent for 2012 models and 36 percent for 2015 models – compared with the fuel economy of its 2005 fleet. Overall, Ford expects to achieve cumulative gasoline fuel savings from advanced technology vehicles of 16 billion gallons from 2005 to 2015.
* Next month at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Ford will discuss in detail the company’s accelerated vehicle electrification plan, which includes bringing to market by 2012 a family of hybrids, plug-in hybrids and battery electric vehicles. The work will include partnering with battery and powertrain systems suppliers to deliver a full battery electric vehicle (BEV) in a van-type vehicle for commercial fleet use in 2010 and a BEV sedan in 2011. Ford said it will develop these vehicles in a manner that enables it to reduce costs and ultimately make BEVs more affordable for consumers.
* The 2007 UAW-Ford negotiations resulted in significant progress being made in reducing the company’s total labor cost. Given the present economic crisis and its impact upon the automotive industry, however, Ford is presently engaged in discussions with the UAW with the objective to further reduce its cost structure and eliminate the remaining labor cost gap that exists between Ford and the transplants.
* As previously was announced, Ford plans two additional plant closures this quarter and four additional plant closures between 2009 and 2011. The company also has announced its intent to close or sell what will be four remaining ACH plants. The company said it will continue to aggressively match manufacturing capacity to real demand.
* Ford will continue to work to reduce its dealer and supplier base to increase efficiency and promote mutual profitability. By year end, Ford estimates it will have 3,790 U.S. dealers, a reduction of 606 dealers overall – or 14 percent from year-end 2005 – including a reduction of 16 percent in large markets. In addition, Ford has been able to reduce the number of production suppliers eligible for major sourcing from 3,400 in 2004 to approximately 1,600 today, a reduction of 53 percent. Ford eventually plans to further reduce the number of suppliers eligible for major sourcing to 750.
* Ford also confirmed today that it has decided to sell its five corporate aircraft. In addition, Ford CEO Mulally announced that, should Ford need to access funds from a potential government bridge loan, he would work for a salary of $1 a year – as a sign of his confidence in the company’s transformation plan and future.

Ford also reiterated that it is canceling all bonuses to be paid in 2009 for all management employees worldwide and foregoing bonuses for all employees in North America. The company also will not pay merit increases for North America salaried employees in 2009.

Ford said it is moving fully ahead with plans it announced this summer to leverage the company’s global product strengths and bring more smaller, fuel-efficient vehicles to the U.S. The plan includes delivering best-in-class or among the best fuel economy with every new vehicle introduced. Ford also is introducing industry-leading, fuel-saving EcoBoost engines and doubling the number and volume of hybrid vehicles.

This product acceleration will result in a balanced product portfolio with a complete family of small, medium and large cars, utilities and trucks. Ford said it is increasing its investment in cars and crossovers from approximately 60 percent in 2007 to 80 percent of its total product investment in 2010.

“Ford has a comprehensive transformation plan that will ensure our future viability – as evidenced by our profitability in the first quarter of 2008,” Mulally said. “While we clearly still have much more work to do, I am more convinced than ever that we have the right plan that will create a viable Ford going forward and position us for profitable growth.”

[Source: Ford]



Related posts:



Related posts:



Ford Officially Looking To Sell Volvo [Carpocalypse Now]

Ford announced today it is officially looking to sell Volvo, the premium Swedish automaker that the company acquired in 1999 and made an important part of its Premier Auto Group (PAG). Oh what a difference a decade makes. Ford paid $6.45 billion in 1999 dollars for the automaker in a fierce bidding war with Volkswagen AG and Fiat. In preparation for a sale Volvo will be made more of a stand-alone company. Volvo was the last of the PAG brands left after Land Rover/Jaguar were sold to Tata and Aston Martin was sold to an investment firm. Why sell the company? In the midst of a bad market the company's slumping sales are a thumb on Ford's already heavy scales. Who would buy Volvo? Why not Volkswagen or Fiat? Both companies could pick it up for an amount we assume is less than $6.45 billion. Press release below the jump.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY ANNOUNCES IT WILL RE-EVALUATE STRATEGIC OPTIONS FOR VOLVO CAR CORPORATION

DEARBORN, Mich., Dec. 1, 2008 – Ford Motor Company [NYSE: F] announced today it will re-evaluate strategic options for Volvo Car Corporation, including the possible sale of the Sweden-based premium automaker.

Ford said the decision to re-evaluate strategic options for Volvo comes in response to the significant decline in the global auto industry particularly in the past three months and the severe economic instability worldwide. The strategic review of Volvo is in line with a broad range of actions Ford is taking to strengthen its balance sheet and ensure it has the resources to implement its product-led transformation plan.

“Given the unprecedented external challenges facing Ford and the entire industry, it is prudent for Ford to evaluate options for Volvo as we implement our ONE Ford plan,” said Ford President and CEO Alan Mulally. “Volvo is a strong global brand with a proud heritage of safety and environmental responsibility and has launched an aggressive plan to right-size its operations and improve its financial results. As we conduct this review, we are committed to making the best decision for both Ford and Volvo going forward.”

Ford said the review likely will take several months to complete. In the meantime, Ford will continue working closely with Volvo as it implements its restructuring plan under CEO Stephen Odell, who was appointed to lead Volvo earlier this year.

At the same time, Ford and Volvo will continue to put in place processes that allow Volvo to operate on a more stand-alone basis in the absence of the Premier Automotive Group structure, an effort which began in November 2007 following a previous review by Ford of strategic options for Volvo.

“Outstanding safety, an increased focus on environmentally friendly vehicles and contemporary Scandinavian design will continue to be the foundation upon which we will build a strong Volvo business for the future.” Odell said. “We intend to build upon our strong brand heritage and to appeal to our global customers with vehicles like the new XC60 – the safest car Volvo has ever built. Volvo also will introduce seven low-emission models in 2009, giving us the best environmental product range in the premium segment.

“We have a strong brand presence in Europe, North America and the Asia Pacific region, and are growing in key markets such as China and Russia, where we are the leading premium brand.”

Ford Motor Company, a global automotive industry leader based in Dearborn, Michigan, United States, manufactures or distributes automobiles in 200 markets across six continents. With about 224,000 employees and about 90 plants worldwide, the company’s core and affiliated automotive brands include Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Volvo and Mazda. The company provides financial services through Ford Motor Credit Company. For more information regarding Ford’s products, please visit www.ford.com.

[Source: Ford]



Related posts:



Related posts: